Tag Archives: lithium

#Chinese Space Computing Industry Innovation Center

In early June, the Chinese government quietly approved the creation of the Space Computing Industry Innovation Center, a major initiative designed to unite rocket and satellite manufacturers, semiconductor companies, and AI technology firms in building a space-based computing network. According to Beijing officials, the project aims to integrate the entire space-computing supply chain while accelerating the development of the satellite Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystem.

The announcement largely flew under the radar, but industry observers quickly noted its significance. Research firm SemiAnalysis pointed out on X that China unveiled the initiative roughly a week before Elon Musk revealed plans for his AI1 satellite, a spacecraft intended to run AI workloads directly in orbit.

The center is scheduled to officially launch later this month and will focus on six key areas of research: developing highly reliable, heat-resistant computing chips for space environments; building high-performance interconnected computing payloads; establishing standardized satellite computing platforms; training large AI models under severe power constraints; integrating space- and ground-based cloud networking systems; and creating service-oriented, tokenized business models for orbital computing resources.

Together, these efforts are aimed at creating an AI-powered data center in orbit—one that operates independently of terrestrial power grids and sidesteps many of the energy, land, and infrastructure constraints facing traditional data centers on Earth.

While Musk’s AI1 satellite has dominated headlines this week, China’s move suggests that the race toward space-based AI infrastructure is becoming increasingly competitive. However, it is worth noting that Musk’s ambitions in this area are not new. He has discussed the concept of orbital computing since late 2025 and, in February 2026, SpaceX filed plans with the FCC for a one-million-satellite Orbital Data Center System. Meanwhile, Jeff Bezos has entered the field as well, with Project Sunrise—a proposed constellation of 51,600 satellites operating in sun-synchronous orbit.

What distinguishes China’s approach is its emphasis on collaboration. Rather than relying on a single corporate entity, Beijing is coordinating multiple companies, research institutions, and industrial partners to jointly develop the underlying technologies required for space-based AI computing. By contrast, SpaceX and Blue Origin appear to be pursuing largely independent strategies. SpaceX, in particular, seems focused on vertical integration, supported by projects such as its massive Gigasat manufacturing facility and Musk’s ambitious TeraFab initiative.

Whether a centralized, state-coordinated ecosystem will outperform the resource-intensive efforts of a handful of private companies remains an open question. A collaborative model could distribute risk and make resulting technologies broadly accessible across Chinese industry, while private-sector approaches may benefit from faster execution and tighter integration.

What is clear, however, is that China is treating orbital computing infrastructure as a strategic priority. For a country that already possesses abundant electricity generation capacity and significant room for expanding terrestrial data centers, its willingness to invest heavily in space-based computing highlights the growing belief that the next frontier of AI infrastructure may extend far beyond Earth’s surface.

Source: MSN

Forget Data Centers In Space. This Startup Wants To Float Them At Sea

While Elon Musk has been promoting an ambitious vision of orbital data centers as one of SpaceX’s major future businesses, another startup is pursuing a very different approach. Panthalassa, backed by Peter Thiel and a group of prominent technology investors, believes that ocean-based data centers offer a more practical and cost-effective solution.

The company is developing underwater facilities powered and cooled by the ocean itself. It began testing its prototype, Ocean-2, off the coast of Washington state in 2025. Panthalassa argues that this model could address many of the concerns surrounding land-based data centers, which have increasingly faced criticism for driving up utility costs, generating noise and pollution, and delivering limited economic benefits to local communities.

SpaceX, meanwhile, aims to begin launching its solar-powered orbital data centers by 2028. The concept envisions a vast network of satellites processing information in space and transmitting it back to Earth. The idea reflects the bold, futuristic vision often associated with Musk. However, the company’s IPO filing acknowledges the significant challenges involved, noting that the initiative depends on complex and largely unproven technologies that may require substantial advances before becoming commercially viable.

Source: Forbes

Shin-Etsu’s New #RareEarth Refinery: Strengthening #Japan’s Supply Chain

Global supply chains map highlighting the flow of rare earth elements and strategic resources. Features regions like North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia connected by colorful supply chain routes and resource flows. Key insights include diversified sourcing and sustainability.

Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., one of Japan’s leading producers of rare earth magnets, is planning to construct a new rare earth refining facility in Japan as part of its strategy to strengthen supply chain resilience and reduce dependence on China.

The new refinery, which will be the company’s third facility in Fukui Prefecture in western Japan, is intended to enhance Shin-Etsu’s ability to maintain a stable supply of rare-earth products and permanent magnets. While the company has not disclosed the project’s capacity, schedule, or investment value, reports from the Nikkei indicate that the development will require an investment exceeding ¥35 billion (approximately US$218 million), with nearly half of the funding expected to come from government subsidies.

Rare earths have become increasingly important from both economic and geopolitical perspectives, as major economies seek to diversify supply sources and reduce China’s dominance in rare earth mining and processing. The issue is expected to feature prominently at the upcoming G7 summit in France.

Japan has also faced supply challenges following China’s suspension of exports of certain critical materials since early 2026, amid ongoing diplomatic tensions linked to comments made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan.

According to analysts at Citigroup, the Shin-Etsu project is considered strategically important from a national security standpoint. Shin-Etsu is one of Japan’s three major magnet manufacturers, alongside TDK Corp. and Proterial Ltd. In addition to its two existing facilities in Fukui, the company also operates a rare earth business in Vietnam.

Source: Bloomberg

Reliance, Vedanta, Adani: Investing in India’s Rare Earth Future

A silhouette of India filled with colorful rare earth mineral stones, set against a landscape featuring wind turbines and electric vehicle charging stations, highlighting the theme of sustainable energy.

Indian industrial groups Reliance, Vedanta and Adani have shown interest in developing facilities to process Andhra Pradesh state’s significant reserves of increasingly important rare-earth minerals, according to two sources with knowledge of the matter.

With New Delhi seeking to cut India’s dependence on China for rare earths, the three companies are among about 10 who have expressed interest in setting up rare earth facilities in the southern state, one of the sources said.

Andhra Pradesh holds 211 million metric tons of beach sand mineral resources, including rare earths, across 16 identified coastal deposits, according to a draft document. India has 482.6 million tons of rare earth ore resources, according to the Geological Survey of India.

RARE EARTH AMBITIONS

The interest comes as New Delhi steps up efforts to build domestic rare earth mining, processing and magnet manufacturing capacity, while Andhra Pradesh aims to attract 500 billion rupees ($5.2 billion) in rare earth and titanium investments over the next decade.

The plans were set out in a draft government document.

The Andhra Pradesh government, Reliance Industries Ltd, Vedanta Ltd and Adani Enterprises Ltd did not respond to Reuters emails seeking comment.

Andhra Pradesh was among four states identified in February’s federal budget for the development of rare earth “corridors” covering mining, processing and magnet production.

The initiative followed New Delhi’s approval in November of a 73 billion rupee programme to support rare earth magnet manufacturing.

Rare earth elements are essential for permanent magnets used in applications such as electric vehicle motors. While India holds substantial rare earth reserves, it lacks industrial-scale facilities capable of processing the minerals to high purity levels.

CAPITAL INCENTIVES AND OTHER MEASURES

Andhra Pradesh plans to issue tenders for rare earth facilities after securing cabinet approval for its rare earth corridor policy, which is expected within a month, the sources said.

The state also plans to offer capital-linked incentives and additional benefits for projects with investments of 10 billion rupees or more, the sources said.

Andhra Pradesh has been courting large-scale investments, attracting companies including Google and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel, and aims to secure $1 trillion in investment commitments by 2029, a state minister told Reuters last November.

October 19, 2016 

‘#India not realising potential of #RareEarth industry’ | A Blog for Browsing Mining, Mineral Processing, and Metals Info

Source: MSN

Introducing Oppanol® N PLUS: A Breakthrough in #EVBattery Materials

Infographic illustrating the evolution of battery technology from the 1900s to the 2020s, featuring images of various battery types including lead-acid, nickel-iron, lithium-ion, and solid-state batteries, alongside keywords and descriptions reflecting advancements in materials and performance.

BASF Introduces Oppanol® N PLUS for Next-Generation EV Batteries at Battery Show Europe 2026

BASF has unveiled Oppanol® N PLUS, a new high-performance binder designed to address the evolving demands of next-generation electric vehicle (EV) batteries. The company is showcasing the innovation at the Battery Show Europe 2026, taking place from June 9–11 in Stuttgart, Germany.

As battery technologies advance toward solid-state batteries (SSBs), manufacturers require materials that can deliver greater reliability, efficiency, and performance. Solid-state batteries are expected to provide longer driving ranges, faster charging capabilities, and enhanced safety, increasing the performance requirements for every component within the battery system.

Advancing Battery Performance and Manufacturing Consistency

Developed using BASF’s established polyisobutylene (PIB) technology, Oppanol® N PLUS is engineered specifically for modern battery applications. As a critical binder material, it helps maintain cohesion among active materials in the cathode, anode, or electrolyte while preserving structural integrity throughout the battery’s operational life.

The material’s high elasticity and flexibility enable it to absorb mechanical stresses caused by repeated charging and discharging cycles, supporting enhanced durability and long-term battery stability. Its chemically inert nature also helps minimize unwanted side reactions that could negatively affect battery performance.

One of the standout features of Oppanol® N PLUS is its consistently high product quality, achieved through tightly controlled manufacturing specifications. This allows battery producers to reduce process variability, limit reformulation efforts, streamline quality-control procedures, and implement production adjustments more efficiently and reliably.

To further support customers, BASF is improving product accessibility through stock availability and more flexible supply options, including package sizes starting at 20 kilograms. These measures are intended to help battery manufacturers and OEMs accelerate the development and commercialization of high-performance batteries for electric mobility.

According to Madeleine Jordan, Global Business Management Oppanol at BASF, the launch demonstrates the company’s commitment to combining decades of materials expertise with the evolving needs of the electromobility sector, while continuously enhancing proven technologies to support sustainable innovation.

Celebrating 95 Years of Oppanol Innovation

The introduction of Oppanol® N PLUS coincides with a major milestone for BASF: 95 years of polyisobutylene innovation.

The origins of the Oppanol product family date back to 1931, when chemist Michael Otto successfully demonstrated the polymerization of isobutene under suitable conditions. That same year, BASF patented a manufacturing process for polyisobutylene (PIB), which later became known as Oppanol—a name derived from Oppau, the Ludwigshafen district where the technology originated.

After seven years of intensive research and development, BASF began industrial-scale production in 1938 at its dedicated Oppanol facility. The material soon gained international recognition for its transparency, resistance to water and gases, chemical stability, safety profile, and strong adhesive properties.

Today, Oppanol is used across a broad range of industries and applications, including chewing gum, medical adhesive bandages, insulating glass units, cable insulation, roofing membranes, pipeline coatings, and advanced battery systems. Its durability, reliability, and chemical resistance have enabled the material to remain relevant while evolving to meet the requirements of emerging energy technologies.

With the launch of Oppanol® N PLUS, BASF is building on nearly a century of innovation, positioning the technology to support the future of electric mobility and advanced energy storage solutions.

Source: The Battery Magazine

#India’s #EV Market Gains Momentum as Fuel Costs Rise, but Challenges Remain

Busy street scene in Chennai featuring an MTC electric bus and several electric scooters, with pedestrians and signage in the background.

India’s electric vehicle (EV) market is gaining traction as rising fuel prices, regulatory changes, and expanding model offerings encourage more consumers to switch from conventional vehicles.

Electric car sales rose 25% in the year ending March 2026, with EVs surpassing 5% of India’s passenger vehicle market—a key milestone often viewed as the threshold for mainstream adoption. Growth has been strongest in vehicles priced above ₹1 million, where EVs now account for one in every ten sales.

The recent surge in crude oil prices, driven in part by tensions in the Middle East, has strengthened the economic case for EVs. India imports nearly 90% of its oil requirements, making it vulnerable to global energy price fluctuations. Higher fuel costs have prompted increased consumer interest in electric mobility.

Long-term policy support is also expected to drive adoption. Proposed CAFE-3 emission standards, scheduled to take effect from April 2027, would significantly tighten fuel-efficiency and carbon-emission requirements for automakers. Industry analysts believe the new regulations could accelerate EV penetration by making compliance targets more stringent and enforceable.

State governments are also pushing the transition. Delhi has proposed phasing out registrations of new internal combustion engine (ICE) two- and three-wheelers by 2027 as part of efforts to reduce air pollution.

Analysts expect further growth to be supported by a strong pipeline of new EV launches, particularly in the passenger vehicle and two-wheeler segments. Nomura forecasts EV penetration in India’s passenger vehicle market could reach 9% by 2030.

Despite the positive outlook, significant challenges remain. Charging infrastructure continues to lag demand, with public charging stations increasing to more than 10,000 nationwide but remaining concentrated in a few states. Consumer concerns over charging availability and driving range continue to slow adoption.

India also remains heavily dependent on imported battery materials and rare earth elements, exposing the sector to supply-chain and geopolitical risks. Industry experts note that developing a fully integrated domestic EV supply chain could take more than a decade.

While rising fuel prices and supportive policies are boosting demand, industry observers say the pace of India’s EV transition will ultimately depend on regulatory certainty, infrastructure expansion, and stronger domestic manufacturing capabilities.

This version is structured in a concise business-news style, focusing on market trends, drivers, forecasts, and risks rather than narrative storytelling.

Source: BBC News

#India to Launch Incentive Policy for #Lithium and #Nickel Processing

NEW DELHI: India’s Ministry of Mines is expected to soon introduce an incentive policy aimed at boosting domestic processing of lithium and nickel, with a proposed outlay of approximately ₹3,000 crore (US$313.48 million), according to two sources familiar with the development.

The sources requested anonymity as they were not authorized to speak publicly on the matter. The Ministry of Mines did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

Reuters had reported in January that the planned incentive scheme would focus on lithium and nickel processing. In April, the Mines Secretary stated that the government had shortlisted two critical minerals for a processing policy designed to strengthen the electric vehicle (EV) value chain, though the specific minerals were not disclosed at the time.

Lithium and nickel are key components in EV batteries and are considered vital to India’s clean mobility ambitions. The government aims to increase electric vehicle adoption to 30% of passenger car sales and 80% of two-wheeler sales by 2030, up from the current levels of 6% and 9%, respectively.

Under the proposed policy, lithium processing facilities would be required to have a minimum annual capacity of 30,000 metric tonnes, while nickel processing plants would need a minimum capacity of 50,000 metric tonnes to qualify for incentives, Reuters previously reported.

#SouthKorea export growth hits four-decade high on #AI chip boom

Graphical representation of Korea's exports featuring stacked shipping containers in blue and red, overlaid on a map of Korea, with an upward trend arrow indicating growth.

SEOUL: South Korea’s exports grew more than expected in May at the strongest annual rate in more than four decades, as chip sales hit a record on a global boom in AI investment, bolstering optimism about the trade-reliant economy and its world-beating stock market rally.

Exports from Asia’s fourth-largest economy, a bellwether for global trade, rose 53.2% from a year earlier to a record high of $87.75 billion, preliminary trade data showed on Monday, exceeding the median 48.4% increase forecast in a Reuters poll.

It was the 12th consecutive month of exports growing on a year-on-year basis and the biggest percentage rise since January 1984, bringing a record monthly trade surplus for the country.

“It is truly an unprecedented pace, raising market expectations again and again and exceeding them again and again,” said Stephen Lee, an economist at Meritz Securities in Seoul.

Read more at: The Star

#China’s Secret Advantage in the #RareEarth Race Isn’t Mining—It’s Talent

A digital illustration of Earth from space highlighting Asia, featuring glowing city lights and the countries China, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, and Taiwan, with colorful crystals and gems cascading towards the viewer.

When the world talks about rare earths, the conversation usually centers on mines, supply chains, and geopolitics. Governments in Washington, Brussels, Canberra, and Tokyo are investing billions to reduce dependence on China for these critical minerals, which are essential for electric vehicles, wind turbines, advanced electronics, and military systems.

But while Western policymakers focus on extracting more rare earths from the ground, China has spent decades investing in something much harder to replicate: people.

In the northern Chinese city of Baotou, often called the country’s rare earth capital, a sophisticated ecosystem of universities, research institutes, laboratories, and industrial facilities has created a steady pipeline of highly specialized talent. This workforce may be China’s most durable advantage in the global competition for critical minerals.

Building a Rare Earth Talent Factory

Each year, hundreds of students enroll in specialized rare earth programs at institutions such as the Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology. Unlike traditional mining degrees found elsewhere in the world, these programs focus specifically on the science, engineering, and processing of rare earth elements.

Graduates can move directly into nearby refining facilities, magnet manufacturing plants, or advanced research institutes. In Baotou, the distance between classroom, laboratory, and factory can be measured in kilometers rather than continents.

This tight integration between education and industry has produced a workforce capable of contributing immediately upon graduation. Industry veterans who have worked in both China and the West often note that Chinese graduates arrive with practical knowledge tailored to rare earth production, while workers elsewhere may require years of additional training.

Why Rare Earths Are So Difficult

The challenge isn’t finding rare earths. These elements are relatively abundant in the Earth’s crust.

The real difficulty lies in processing them.

Rare earth refining involves separating 17 chemically similar elements, a complex and costly process requiring advanced expertise in chemistry, metallurgy, and engineering. Producing materials such as neodymium and praseodymium—critical ingredients in high-performance magnets—requires intricate sequences of chemical treatments and separations.

Success depends not only on equipment and capital but also on decades of accumulated technical knowledge.

That expertise has become one of China’s most valuable strategic assets.

A Nationwide Research Network

China’s rare earth dominance is supported by an extensive research infrastructure.

The country hosts more than 40 dedicated rare earth laboratories and research institutes, many located near major mining regions. Universities, state-owned enterprises, and government-funded research centers collaborate closely, accelerating the transfer of new discoveries from laboratory experiments to industrial-scale production.

This model allows innovations to move rapidly through the development pipeline. Researchers develop new processing technologies, which can then be adopted by state-backed producers and scaled up for commercial use.

The result is a level of coordination that few countries have been able to match.

The West’s Lost Expertise

For much of the twentieth century, the United States and Europe led the world in rare earth processing.

That leadership gradually disappeared as environmental concerns, lower costs overseas, and shifting industrial priorities pushed much of the industry to China. As refining capacity moved abroad, educational programs and specialized expertise followed.

Today, relatively few Western universities offer dedicated rare earth programs. While institutions such as Ames National Laboratory in Iowa maintain strong research capabilities, the broader educational ecosystem remains limited compared with China’s.

The challenge is not simply building new mines or processing facilities. It is rebuilding a generation of scientists, engineers, and technicians with highly specialized skills.

That process can take decades.

The Geopolitical Stakes

Rare earths sit at the intersection of economic competitiveness and national security.

Advanced fighter aircraft, missile guidance systems, submarines, radar equipment, electric vehicles, and renewable energy technologies all depend on materials refined using rare earth processing expertise.

As tensions between China and the United States continue, Beijing’s control over more than 90% of global rare earth processing and magnet production gives it significant leverage in global supply chains.

Recent export restrictions and tighter controls on technology transfer suggest that China increasingly views rare earth expertise as a strategic resource that must be protected, much like advanced semiconductor technologies.

For policymakers in the West, this raises a difficult question: Can billions of dollars in investment recreate a talent ecosystem that China has spent decades building?

The Road Ahead

The race for rare earth independence is often portrayed as a battle over mines and factories. In reality, it is equally a competition for knowledge.

China’s dominance did not emerge overnight. It was built through long-term investment in education, research, industrial policy, and workforce development. Mines can be developed relatively quickly, and factories can be constructed within a few years. Building generations of specialists, however, requires patience and sustained commitment.

As countries seek to diversify supply chains and secure access to critical minerals, they may discover that the most valuable rare earth resource is not buried underground at all.

It is the expertise required to turn those minerals into the technologies that power the modern world.

Source: Reuters

Cleaner E-Waste #Gold and #Copper Metal Recovery by University of #Edinburgh

A green robotic arm in a recycling facility picks up circuit boards from a conveyor belt filled with electronic waste, with brightly colored containers labeled 'Copper', 'Gold', 'Palladium', and 'Silver' in the background.

The University of Edinburgh has licensed a gold and copper recovery process to mineral processing company Lithium Universe, enabling cleaner extraction of high‑value metals from electronic waste.

Developed by Professors Jason Love and Carole Morrison in the School of Chemistry, and commercialized with support from Edinburgh Innovations, the Gold Copper Diamide Extraction (GCDE) process uses organic compounds to selectively extract metals from discarded electronics.

Under an exclusive agreement, Lithium Universe will deploy and sub‑license the technology globally as part of its expanding precious metals recycling strategy.

E‑waste is one of the world’s fastest-growing hazardous waste streams, projected to reach around 93.5 million tonnes by 2030, but only about 20% is recycled using environmentally sound methods, the University said.

This waste is valuable, as devices and printed circuit boards are rich in gold and copper. At current prices, the gold content of one tonne of typical e‑waste is worth more than $46,000, with copper adding roughly another $2,000, it estimates.

But traditional e‑waste processing relies on furnace smelting above 1,200°C or aggressive leaching, both energy‑intensive and polluting, the University noted. Its GCDE process instead uses low‑temperature hydrometallurgy and small, reusable organic ligands to target metals in sequence, under mild conditions and avoiding cyanide, mercury and organic solvent extraction.

“Electronic waste is effectively a high‑grade ‘urban ore’. Our goal was to design chemistry that can recover those metals selectively and safely, without the energy and environmental cost of smelting,” Love said in a news release.

“The diamide behaves like a molecular magnet for gold. By following with a selective copper step, we can recover two of the most valuable metals in e‑waste with high purity and lower environmental impact.”

Lithium Universe plans to integrate GCDE into its precious metals recycling division, alongside its silver recovery technologies for end‑of‑life solar panels.

“This breakthrough from the University of Edinburgh reinforces the strategic expansion of our precious metals recycling division into high-value recovery technologies,” executive chair Iggy Tan said. By integrating selective metal recovery with sustainable processing, the company would “strengthen its competitive position in circular-economy solutions for gold, silver and copper recovery,” he added.

« Older Entries